Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition

Partner Portal Login    Partner Portal Information

Author: Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition

  • Senseless Violence in Our Backyard: The Assault on James Ellerby Demands Stronger Policing to Protect Every Citizen — Including the Homeless

    Senseless Violence in Our Backyard: The Assault on James Ellerby Demands Stronger Policing to Protect Every Citizen — Including the Homeless

    Palatka, Florida — In the early hours of a recent April morning, an elderly man known affectionately throughout Putnam County as “Uncle James” was brutally beaten in a local business complex. James Ellerby, described by neighbors and friends as a harmless, friendly fixture around town — often seen at places like Dollars or More, joining Bible studies, and chatting with anyone who passed by — now lies in critical condition. He was life-flighted following the assault on April 8, 2026.* Community members who have known him for years emphasize that, while he might occasionally be loud or have a drink, he posed no threat to anyone. “He didn’t deserve to be beaten,” one resident posted, echoing the heartbreak felt across local Facebook groups. A suspect, Jacquez Stephon Miller, 26, was quickly apprehended and is being held in Putnam County. The community has rallied with prayers and held a vigil “by his tree,” with family permission. Yet the speed of the arrest does not erase the horror of the unprovoked attack — or the deeper questions it raises about safety in our streets.

    Details regarding Mr. Ellerby’s assault are drawn from community accounts shared in local social media. The PCHSC will update this post as additional verified reporting becomes available.

    A Neighbor, Not a Problem

    The Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition was built on a foundational conviction: people experiencing homelessness are our neighbors. Not problems to be managed. Not eyesores to be displaced. Neighbors — with names, histories, relationships, and the same right to safety as anyone else in this county.

    This is not an isolated tragedy. It is a painful illustration of how quickly senseless violence can strike the most vulnerable among us. James Ellerby’s story shines a harsh light on the daily risks faced by elderly residents, those with visible challenges, and — crucially — people experiencing homelessness who often gather in similar public or semi-public spaces. When someone can be beaten so severely in a business complex in our own community, it forces us to ask: Are our current policing strategies doing enough to prevent these acts before they happen?

    The research is clear and consistent: people experiencing homelessness are more likely to be victims of violent crime than perpetrators. [ABC News] In Los Angeles, for example, unhoused people were suspects in 11% of homicides — but victims in 23% of homicides. [ABC News] The National Coalition for the Homeless has documented nearly 2,000 incidents of violence against people who were homeless over a 23-year period, with at least 588 unhoused victims violently killed simply for being unhoused. [National Coalition for the Homeless] And less than half of violent victimizations of people experiencing homelessness are ever reported to police. [National Coalition for the Homeless] The violence is real, pervasive, and largely invisible.

    The Pattern Behind the Incident

    Too often, law enforcement is left to respond after the damage is done. An arrest is important, but prevention saves lives. We need better policing — proactive, community-oriented, and adequately resourced — to protect all citizens, especially those who lack stable housing or social safety nets. The misperception that people without homes are perpetrators, rather than victims, of violence contributes to both criminalizing homelessness and dehumanizing people without housing. [Ucsf] Homeless individuals are disproportionately targeted for violence precisely because they are visible, exposed, and sometimes stereotyped as “problems” rather than neighbors. They sleep in parks, under bridges, or near storefronts where help is scarce after dark. Attacks most commonly occur in locations where homeless individuals tend to be more visible and thus more vulnerable to people passing by. [National Coalition for the Homeless] Without consistent police presence, trained officers who know the community, and partnerships with local advocates, these spaces become danger zones rather than safe places to exist.

    What Better Policing Looks Like in Putnam County

    What would better policing look like in Putnam County? It starts with increased, visible patrols in high-traffic areas where vulnerable residents congregate — not as harassment, but as genuine protection. It means officers trained in de-escalation and mental health crisis intervention, recognizing signs of vulnerability rather than defaulting to enforcement alone. The evidence base here is strong: a landmark randomized controlled trial with the Louisville Metro Police Department found that de-escalation training was associated with statistically significant declines in uses of force (−28.1%), citizen injuries (−26.3%), and officer injuries (−36.0%). [Train-de-trainer] More recent research from Tempe, Arizona found that trained officers were 58% less likely to injure community members. [National Policing Institute] Officers equipped to recognize vulnerability — rather than defaulting to enforcement alone — produce better outcomes for everyone.

    It requires stronger collaboration between the Palatka Police Department, Putnam County Sheriff’s Office, and community organizations that work directly with the homeless population. The Lancet has noted that improvements in multiagency collaboration — between homeless shelters, health-care services, and police forces — are likely to be important in reducing the risk of victimization in marginalized populations affected by homelessness. [The Lancet] When police and advocates share information and resources, small problems don’t escalate into life-threatening violence.

    Safety and Housing Are the Same Issue

    We cannot keep treating violence against the homeless as somehow less urgent than violence against housed residents. Every citizen deserves to feel safe walking our streets or simply existing in public spaces. James Ellerby’s assault reminds us that the line between “housed” and “unhoused” is thinner than we think — anyone can find themselves in a vulnerable position through illness, job loss, or age. Ignoring the risks faced by our unhoused neighbors doesn’t make the rest of us safer; it erodes safety for everyone.

    The fewer people living unsheltered in Putnam County, the fewer people are exposed to the risks Uncle James faced that morning. Research has found that rehousing older adults may directly reduce the risk of experiencing violent victimization. [PubMed Central] A UCLA study found that housing assistance reduces the probability of committing a crime by 80 percent and lowers emergency department visits by 80 percent within 18 months. [National Low Income Housing Coalition] Studies show that areas with housing assistance programs experience decreased violent crime and improved public safety. [Casebook]

    This is why the PCHSC’s push toward Functional Zero — a measurable, achievable goal of ending chronic homelessness in Putnam County — is not just a housing goal. It is a public safety goal. It is a violence prevention goal. Permanent supportive housing, low-barrier shelter access, and robust street outreach are not “soft” responses to a hard problem. They are upstream interventions that reduce harm before it occurs. Reactive policing without housing solutions is a band-aid on a wound that keeps reopening. We need both.

    A Call to Action

    Local leaders, law enforcement administrators, and city and county officials must act now. Allocate resources for community policing programs. Invest in training that equips officers to prevent violence rather than just investigate it. Support permanent shelter solutions (such as the R.I.S.E. Initiative) and outreach teams that reduce the number of people forced to live exposed on our streets. These are not “soft on crime” measures — they are smart, effective crime prevention that honors the dignity of every human being in Putnam County.

    As friends, neighbors, and fellow residents continue to pray for James Ellerby’s full recovery and for justice, let us turn that collective concern into concrete demands. Contact your city commissioners and county leaders. Urge them to prioritize funding for enhanced policing strategies that protect the vulnerable. Stand with local coalitions working on homelessness solutions, because safe housing and safe streets go hand in hand.

    James Ellerby did not deserve this vicious beating. No one does. But thoughts and prayers alone will not stop the next attack. We need better policing — smarter, stronger, and more connected to the community — to shield every citizen, housed or unhoused, from senseless violence. The time to demand it is now, before another “Uncle James” becomes the next headline.

    To get involved or learn more, visit PutnamHomelessSolutions.org or PutnamHomelessCoalition.org

     

    A note on sourcing: Incident details regarding James Ellerby are drawn from community-shared accounts, as regional media had not published a verified report at the time of writing. All statistical claims are sourced from peer-reviewed research, the National Coalition for the Homeless, the National Policing Institute, and the Urban Institute. Full citations available on request.

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 14: Making It Out — The Messy, Nonlinear Truth

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents

    The Myth:

    “Once you’re homeless, you can’t get out.”

    “You’re either homeless or you’re not—there’s no in-between.”

    “Getting out means pulling yourself up by your bootstraps alone.”

    People treat homelessness like a binary state: you’re either housed or you’re not, stable or you’re not, “out” or you’re still “in.” They assume that climbing out means doing it alone, through sheer willpower and hard work, with a clear finish line where you’re suddenly “fixed.”

    That’s not how it works. And I know—because I’m still in the middle of it.

    My Journey: The Full Story

    I lived in Putnam County for 13 years before I became homeless. I built my business here. My wife and I built our life here. When she died of cancer, the grief didn’t just break my heart—it broke my ability to function.

    Clinical depression locked me away. I could handle repeat customers who already knew me, but every new phone call felt insurmountable. My business crashed not through laziness but through paralysis. I moved friends in who had nowhere else to go, hoping they’d help me stay afloat and maybe give me a reason to keep going.

    Instead, on a single day while I was out working, I came home to find I’d been robbed and my property destroyed.

    That was day one of living in my van with my dog, Fisher.

    The Three-Year Grind

    For over three years, I lived in that van. I bathed in it. I parked overnight in the shelter parking lot—before that shelter closed—because it was one of the few places I could do so without getting “the knock” from police. I slept there with Fisher, ran delivery gigs (DoorDash, Instacart) during the day, filled out job applications between orders, and tried to rebuild my business from the driver’s seat.

    I had no mailing address. No permanent place to receive mail or documents. Every job application that asked for an address was a reminder that the system wasn’t built for someone in my situation.

    I knew where to get a hot meal on Tuesdays and Thursdays. But if I needed help filling out housing applications? Or someone to store my documents safely? Or assistance navigating the maze of eligibility requirements for different programs? Those gaps existed not because organizations didn’t care, but because each operated independently without knowing what the others provided—or didn’t provide.

    I’d get referred from one agency to another, only to find out they’d just closed for the day, or they’d run out of funding for the month, or the service I needed wasn’t offered there after all. Every gap cost me time, energy, and hope—and every failed attempt meant burning gas I couldn’t afford to replace.

    When people told me to “just go to a shelter,” I calculated whether the help offered was actually accessible and safe. The shelters I knew about didn’t allow pets inside—meaning Fisher would have had to stay in my van alone while I slept inside. I wasn’t leaving my dog unprotected. They were in locations in other counties I couldn’t reliably reach without burning gas I couldn’t afford.

    So yes, I stayed in my van. Not because I “preferred” it, but because the alternatives offered weren’t actually viable for my situation.

    The Turning Point

    On September 27, 2025, Putnam County’s only overnight shelter—operated by the Putnam County Caring Coalition—was suspended due to a magistrate ruling on city zoning and fire safety/code violations. Dozens of people lost their only local option.

    I started investigating why. Not as an advocate—as someone who needed answers. That investigation led me to the county grant writer, who put me in contact with Heart of Putnam and invited me to the January 2026 Round Table Alliance meeting.

    That meeting changed everything.

    The Coalition is Born

    At that January Round Table Alliance meeting, the idea of a coordinated Coalition was birthed. Organizations that had been operating in silos realized we needed to work together. By the February meeting, we had a name: the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition.

    And suddenly, I wasn’t just surviving homelessness—I was helping to build the solution.

    Through the Round Table Alliance and Coalition, I met key people: politicians, nonprofit leaders, service providers. I learned that one of the co-founding nonprofits of the Coalition was hiring for a Peer Specialist position—someone with lived experience of addiction, mental health issues, and homelessness who could use that experience to help others.

    I applied. I got the job.

    Now I work as a Peer Specialist at Meridian Healthcare, using my lived experience as an addict/alcoholic, someone with mental health struggles, and someone who’s experienced homelessness, to help others navigate the same crisis I’ve been through.

    What “Out” Really Looks Like

    Here’s the truth people don’t talk about: I’m still technically homeless.

    I’m staying with a friend. I have my own room. It’s relatively stable. But I’m still half in my van.

    If you want the full story—the grief, the van years, the spiritual crisis, the pivot that led to the Coalition, and the ongoing paradox of building solutions while still climbing out—I’ve shared that journey in depth on The Red Conrad Show: “Still Half in My Van: The Real Story of Homelessness and Recovery.”

    It’s raw, it’s honest, and it’s the story behind the work we’re doing here.

    I still keep a change of clothes, supplies, and essentials in there—kind of like my security blanket. I haven’t been able to get myself to completely move out of my van yet, though I haven’t been sleeping in it anymore.

    I love my job. I’m extremely grateful to have it and excited that I can use my lived experience to help others. But I’m still nervous about some things, and I’m finding that certain aspects of the work are showing me that I didn’t have my mental health—mainly my anxiety—as under control as I thought I did.

    “Fully out” for me would be having my own place again. Whether it’s a home or a campervan/RV I can park at a trailer park or campground. The campervan/RV appeals to me mainly because I’ve been used to being in my van so long, and I like the idea of a nomadic lifestyle—even though I have a full-time job now.

    The point is this: “out” isn’t a clean, binary state. It’s a process.

    I’m not “fully housed” yet. I’m not “fully stable” yet. But I’m also not where I was three years ago, bathing in my van and wondering if I’d ever find a way out.

    What Actually Helped (vs. What Didn’t)

    The myths say you have to bootstrap yourself out alone. The myths say you need to be “perfect” before you deserve help. The myths say homelessness is a permanent state you can’t escape.

    Here’s what actually worked:

    Connection, Not Isolation

    I didn’t climb out by isolating myself and grinding harder. I climbed out because investigating the shelter closure connected me to people who were building something bigger. The Coalition introduced me to the grant writer, Heart of Putnam, the Round Table Alliance, and eventually the job that gave me a pathway forward.

    If I’d stayed isolated in my van, trying to do it all alone, I’d still be there.

    Leveraging Lived Experience, Not Hiding It

    For three years, I hid my homelessness. I was ashamed. I tried to look like “just a guy running errands” so no one would know I was living in that van.

    But the job I have now? My homelessness, my addiction, my mental health struggles—they’re not disqualifications. They’re my qualifications. As a Peer Specialist, my lived experience is what makes me effective. The very thing I was ashamed of became the thing that opened the door.

    Gradual Progress, Not Perfection

    I’m not “fixed.” I’m couch surfing. I’m still half in my van. I’m discovering anxiety I didn’t know I still had. But couch surfing is still progress from sleeping in the van. A job I love is still progress from gig work between gas station parking lots. Having a community working toward a solution is still progress from navigating fragmented services alone.

    Progress doesn’t require perfection. It just requires moving forward, even messily.

    Community Support, Not Bootstrapping Alone

    The Coalition didn’t just help me find work—it gave me purpose while I was still homeless. It showed me that my experience mattered, that I had something to contribute, that I wasn’t just a problem to be managed but a voice that needed to be heard.

    You can’t bootstrap yourself out of homelessness alone. You need infrastructure, coordination, and people who see your value even when you can’t see it yourself.

    The Skills You Don’t See

    In the professional world, we value resilience, resource management, and strategic pivoting under pressure. Ironically, these are the exact skills required to survive a night in a car or a tent in Florida.

    When I was living in my van, I was managing resources more carefully than most CFOs manage budgets. Every dollar had to stretch. Every decision—where to park, when to move, how to preserve gas, where to access water—was a calculated risk. I was pivoting constantly, adjusting to changing circumstances, solving problems with limited resources.

    When a person moves from the street into a home, they aren’t “starting from zero.” They are bringing a battle-tested set of skills back into the workforce. At the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, we don’t see “victims”; we see unutilized talent.

    I am standing here today as the direct refutation of the myth that “once homeless, always unemployable.” When I was living in my van with Fisher, I was the same person I am today. The only difference was my environment. The same problem-solving, resilience, and determination that kept me alive in that van are the same skills I bring to my job as a Peer Specialist now.

    Homelessness doesn’t erase capability—it reveals it.

    The Second Crisis: Why Support Matters After the Key

    Here’s what people don’t talk about: Making it out is often harder than staying in.

    Beth (@voiceofbeth), whose story appears in Voices from the Street, touched on the “death of materialism”—the purging of everything you own just to fit into a shelter locker. When you finally get back into a home, you face a new set of “Success Gaps”:

    The Isolation Gap: Moving from a highly visible (though dangerous) community to the four walls of an apartment can be jarring. You went from knowing everyone in the parking lot to knowing no one in your building. The survival network you relied on—people who’d watch your stuff, warn you about police sweeps, share resources—disappears overnight.

    The Financial Lag: The first paycheck often doesn’t come for three weeks, but the lights need to stay on today. Rent, deposits, utilities, furniture, kitchen supplies—they all hit at once. You’re expected to be “stable” immediately, but stability requires money you don’t have yet.

    The Stigma: Carrying the “gap” on a resume or the weight of a prior eviction. Explaining why you don’t have references from the last three years. Hoping the background check doesn’t flag the trespassing citations you got for sleeping in your car.

    The Adjustment: Learning to live indoors again. Trusting that you won’t lose everything overnight. Breaking the hypervigilance that kept you alive on the streets but now keeps you awake in a locked apartment.

    This is why I’m still half in my van. This is why even with a job and a room, I keep supplies in there like a security blanket. The transition from “surviving” to “stable” isn’t a switch you flip—it’s a bridge you cross slowly, and sometimes you look back to make sure the bridge is still there.

    This is why the R.I.S.E. Strategy (led by Heart of Putnam) is so critical. We aren’t just looking for a building to house people; we are building a four-phase system with a network of Alliance Partners—LSF, Meridian, Veteran Building Solutions, Operation Lifeline, and others—to ensure that once a neighbor makes it out, they have the case management and community support to stay out.

    Phase 1 (Day Shelter & Intake) is the launchpad—daytime access to services without overnight pressure. Phase 2 (Shelter Pilot, 3-10 beds) tests operations before scaling. Phase 3 (Full Shelter, 15 beds) provides comprehensive pathways. Phase 4 (Expansion, 20+ beds) becomes the county’s primary response system.

    We are telling our neighbors: “Your current circumstance is not your conclusion.” And we’re building the bridge—not just a single step, but a gradual, supported pathway—that helps people cross from survival to stability without falling through the gaps.

    Your Story Matters

    This is my story of making it out—or trying to. I’m still in the messy middle, still half in my van, still figuring out what stability looks like. But I’m also working, building the Coalition, and helping others navigate the same crisis I’ve been through.

    If you’ve experienced homelessness in Putnam County—whether you’re still in it, climbing out of it, or fully out—your story matters.

    I’m collecting stories from anyone willing to share. Your journey can help someone else see that climbing out is possible, even when it’s messy and nonlinear. Your voice can challenge the myths, show the barriers, and prove that with the right support, people can and do make it out.

    Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to share your story.

    Whether it’s a few sentences or a full narrative, whether you’re fully housed now or still in the process, whether your path looked like mine or completely different—we want to hear it.

    Together, we build a fuller picture of what “making it out” really looks like.

    The Coalition Built While Climbing Out

    The Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition exists because people who’ve been through this crisis decided to build the infrastructure we wish had existed when we needed it. The R.I.S.E. Initiative—with its four-phase rollout from Day Shelter to countywide platform—is what I wish I’d had three years ago when I was living in my van, ashamed and alone.

    If R.I.S.E.’s Phase 1 Day Shelter had existed when I became homeless, I wouldn’t have had to feel ashamed and do it alone. I would’ve had daytime access to case management, employment support, and benefits enrollment—the foundation I needed to get back on my feet sooner rather than over three years later of struggling and driving a vehicle that is about to literally fall apart.

    Now I’m building that system for the next person. And I’m doing it while still climbing out myself.

    That’s the truth about “making it out”: Sometimes you build the ladder while you’re still on it.

    Related Posts:

    – Myths of Homelessness Part 2: “Homelessness is a Choice” — Day one in the van with Fisher

    – Myths of Homelessness Part 13: “Homelessness is Unsolvable” — How the Coalition proves it’s solvable

    – Myths of Homelessness Part 12: “Service Resistance Myth” — Why I stayed in the van instead of going to shelters

    Other Voices:

    – Voices from the Street // Beth — Another journey through homelessness

    My Complete Story:

    For the raw, unfiltered version of my journey—from JoAnne’s death through three years in the van to building the Coalition while still couch surfing—read my three-part series on The Red Conrad Show:

    “Still Half in My Van: The Real Story of Homelessness and Recovery”

    – Part 1: The Wilderness — Grief, Survival, and God’s Silence

    – Part 2: The Pivot — From Investigation to Vocation  

    – Part 3: The Paradox — Building Solutions While Still Climbing Out

     

    This is Part 14 of 14 in the Myths of Homelessness series. Read the complete series Here.

    Get Involved:

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 13: “Homelessness is Unsolvable”

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and the Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents

    When I was living in my van with Fisher, the idea that homelessness was “solvable” felt impossible. I was drowning—working gigs, trying to rebuild my business, dealing with grief from losing my wife—and there was no coordinated system to catch me. No Day Center where I could access case management without surrendering my autonomy. No pathway from “surviving in a parking lot” to “stable housing” that didn’t require me to be perfect first.

    If R.I.S.E. had existed when I became homeless, I wouldn’t have had to feel ashamed and do it alone. I would’ve had the support I needed to get a new job and get back on my feet sooner rather than over three years later of struggling and driving a vehicle that is about to literally fall apart.

    I’m still technically homeless, though I’ve been couch surfing. Trying hard to not end up back in my van. Through trying to find answers for the shelter closure, meeting everyone I’ve met through what became the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, I managed to get a job.

    From my perspective, solving homelessness is exactly what R.I.S.E. is built to do. There will be employment programs, counseling, and structure. This is the support people suffering homelessness need to get back on their own two feet.

    The Myth:

    “Homelessness is unsolvable.”

    “There will always be homeless people.”

    “We’ve tried everything and nothing works.”

    “You can’t fix human nature.”

    This is the most dangerous myth of all—because if we believe it, we stop trying.

    The Reality: In the professional world, no problem is “unsolvable”—it is simply a matter of resource alignment, strategic scaling, and persistent execution. The most dangerous myth of all is the belief that homelessness is a permanent, natural feature of Putnam County that we can only hope to “manage.”

    When people say homelessness is unsolvable, they are usually looking at the results of fragmented, underfunded, and uncoordinated efforts. They’re right—those don’t work. But the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition isn’t interested in repeating the past. We are building a system designed for Functional Zero—where homelessness becomes rare, brief, and non-recurring through sustained data-driven efforts.

    Over these 13 parts, we’ve debunked myths about work, choice, addiction, cost, visibility, safety, demographics, outsiders, efficiency, and service resistance. Every myth had one thing in common: they blamed individuals for a systems failure. The truth? Homelessness isn’t unsolvable—it’s undersolved. We’ve never truly tried a coordinated, professionalized, data-driven approach in Putnam County. Until now.

    The “Functional Zero” Framework

    Solving homelessness isn’t about a “magic wand.” It’s about building a crisis response system where homelessness is rare, brief, and non-recurring. Communities nationwide have achieved this for subpopulations (e.g., veterans, chronic) by maintaining real-time data and housing capacity that exceeds need.

    • Data-Driven Coordination: Through our Coalition meetings, we are moving away from guesswork. We are identifying hundreds of homeless students in our schools (532 documented in Part 9), the veterans, and the working families, and matching them to specific interventions.
    • Public-Private Alignment: This isn’t just a “charity” issue. It’s a community economic priority. By bringing together the City of Palatka Commissioners, business owners, and partners like Meridian, LSF, Heart of Putnam, Veteran Building Solutions, and Operation Lifeline, we create a unified front.
    • The R.I.S.E. Infrastructure: As we detailed in Part 12, we aren’t just giving out tents; we are building a phased, professionalized pathway back to self-sufficiency.

    The Roadmap Forward

    We have a clear, phased plan that we are preparing to present:

    • Phase 1 (The Day Center): Establishing a centralized hub for case management, skills training, employment programs, and counseling. This stabilizes the “Invisible 90%” (Part 7) before they fall further into the cycle.
    • Phase 2 (The Managed Shelter): A soft-launch, high-barrier facility that provides a safe, professional environment to transition people off the streets for good.
    • The Fiscal Reality: We are moving from the “Crisis Cycle” (ER visits, jail stays, and emergency calls) to a proactive system.

    What Does “Solved” Look Like?

    When homelessness is finally rare, brief, and non-recurring in Putnam County, there will be less people hiding all over the county because they’ll have somewhere to go for help. There will be less expense going to the jails and ER. There will overall be less complaints by those in the community that don’t understand homelessness because they won’t be on every corner panhandling—they’ll be rebuilding their lives.

    Specifically:

    • The 532 homeless students in our schools (Part 9) have stable housing so they can focus on learning, not survival
    • Veterans like those served by Veteran Building Solutions and Operation Lifeline (Part 10) have immediate access to specialized housing
    • Working families (Part 1‘s 40% employed) aren’t choosing between rent and groceries
    • People fleeing domestic violence—like Beth (Voices from the Street)—have safe alternatives that don’t require choosing between abuse and homelessness
    • The “Invisible 90%” (Part 7) don’t need to hide anymore
    • People like me don’t spend three years struggling in a van, ashamed and alone, when coordinated support could have gotten us back on our feet in months

    This isn’t utopia. This is what coordinated systems deliver.

    The Boardroom Math (The ROI of R.I.S.E.)

    Solving homelessness isn’t just the moral choice; it’s the fiscally conservative one. As we’ve analyzed throughout this series, the “Crisis Cycle” of doing nothing is the most expensive “service” we provide:

    • The Hidden Cost of Inaction: In Part 6 (The Cost Myth), we broke down how leaving one person on the street costs taxpayers roughly $35,000 to $40,000 a year in ER visits, police calls, and jail stays **(national averages; Central Florida studies cite ~$31,000/year unhoused vs. ~$10,000 in supportive housing—a 68% savings).
    • The Tax Base Truth: As discussed in Part 3 (The Taxpayer Myth), the vast majority of our unhoused neighbors—the “Invisible 90%” from Part 7—are already local residents and former (or current) workers who have contributed to Putnam’s economy.
    • The Coordinated Dividend: By shifting from fragmented charity (Part 11) to a professionalized model like R.I.S.E., we can cut these emergency costs by 50% or more.

    The Bottom Line: It’s a Choice

    In Part 12, I asked: “Why haven’t we built something worth coming inside to?” The answer lies in our collective will. Homelessness is a choice—not a choice made by the person in the van or the woods, but a choice made by a community. We choose whether or not to build the infrastructure required to solve it.

    Florida’s 2025 progress—a 9.13% statewide homelessness reduction and 19.1% drop in unsheltered cases (Council on Homelessness Report)—shows coordinated systems deliver results. In Putnam County, we are choosing to stop managing the symptoms and start curing the cause. We are choosing to R.I.S.E.

    Final Call to Action:

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk?
    Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story for the ‘Voices From The Street’ series.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community.
    Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute.
    Together, we build a fuller picture.

    Thank You to Our Guest

    Special Thanks to Beth (who shares her experience of homelessness across multiple states on Threads and Instagram as @voiceofbeth) whose testimony in Parts 2, 4, 7, 8, and 12—and her full story in. Her full testimony is ‘Voices from the Street // Beth: Sober, Employable, and Breaking Every Stereotype‘—helped us challenge stereotypes with lived truth.

    This is Part 13 of 13 in the Myths of Homelessness series covering the different Myths. Next Part, Part 14, is the final part putting all of Red’s story together into one post and explaining the reality of what making it out of homelessness actually looks like. Read the complete series here.

     

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 12: “The Service Resistance Myth”

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    This post includes testimony from Beth (@voiceofbeth on Instagram/Threads). Her complete testimony is the ‘Voices from the Street // Beth: Sober, Employable, and Breaking Every Stereotype’, used with permission.

    Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents 

    The Reality: In any other industry, if a customer “refuses” a service, you don’t blame the customer; you perform a root cause analysis on the service model. The common narrative in Putnam County is that people stay on the streets because they “don’t want to follow rules.” In reality, many are simply “service-wary” because the existing systems are fragmented, inaccessible, or geographically impossible to reach.

     

    The Myth:

    “They prefer living on the streets.”

    “They won’t come inside.”

    “They refuse help because they don’t want to follow rules.”

    “They’re too stubborn to accept services.”

    I’ve heard this countless times—the assumption that people experiencing homelessness are “service-resistant” because they’re stubborn, prefer freedom, or don’t want accountability. But that misunderstands what’s actually happening.

    When I was homeless in Putnam County, I wasn’t “refusing” help—I was calculating whether the help offered was actually accessible and safe. I had my van, my dog, and what little stability I could maintain. The shelters I knew about required giving up my dog—my only companion and the reason I kept going. They had curfews that would have made my gig work impossible. They were in locations I couldn’t reliably reach without burning gas I couldn’t afford. So yes, I stayed in my van. Not because I “preferred” it, but because the alternatives offered weren’t actually viable for my situation.

    That’s not service resistance. That’s rational decision-making under impossible constraints.

    Why “Resistance” is Often a Rational Choice

    When we look at the data from the front lines, we see that “refusal” is usually a response to Barriers to Entry:

    The Logistics Gap: If a resource is five miles away and there is no county transit, a person isn’t “refusing” help—they are physically unable to reach it. In Putnam County specifically, Palatka’s only overnight shelter closed in November 2025 due to city zoning and code violations, leaving dozens without any local alternative. This wasn’t “service resistance”—this was service unavailability. The nearest shelters require transportation that doesn’t exist in rural Putnam County, creating a geographic barrier that has nothing to do with “following rules.”

    The Safety Trade-off: For many, the autonomy of a tent or a vehicle feels safer than a high-density, unmanaged environment where they might lose their few remaining possessions. Beth, who shares her experience as @voiceofbeth on Instagram and Threads, describes the bed bug crisis in many shelters: “There was a shelter I stayed at in Miami…this place was overrun with bed bugs, okay? Overrun. It was even in their stores of like they had like a clothes closet and this was supposed to have been heat treated…It was not.” When people say “they won’t come inside,” they’re ignoring that sometimes “inside” is less safe than “outside.”

    The Storage Barrier: Beth also explains why “you can’t just go to a shelter” even when beds are available: “It’s not just about the lack of beds and funding. There’s a lot of things like you’re only allowed so many items. In some shelters you only have a teeny tiny locker. And if you just are newly homeless, you have a ton of stuff still. You haven’t gone through that purge of items since you haven’t gone through that death of materialism yet.” If accepting shelter means abandoning everything you own—including documents, medications, or items with sentimental value—that’s not help. That’s forced dispossession.

    The High-Barrier Burden: Requiring someone to be “perfect” (sober, documented, and mentally stable) before they can get a roof is like requiring a drowning person to learn to swim before you throw them a life ring. Many shelters require: no pets (forcing people to abandon their only companion and source of safety), mandatory religious services (violating personal beliefs), 30-day sobriety verification (impossible to obtain while living on streets), curfews (incompatible with work schedules), or separation of couples/families. These aren’t “reasonable rules”—they’re barriers that exclude the people who need help most.

    As we discussed in **Part 5**, you cannot enable a human being into wanting to sleep in the woods. The inverse is also true: you cannot shame someone into accepting “help” that makes their situation worse.

    The R.I.S.E. Strategy: Meeting People Where They Are

    The Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition isn’t just building a “shelter.” We are launching the R.I.S.E. Initiative—a phased, professionalized response system that eliminates these barriers.

    Phase 1: Day Shelter & Intake (Months 1-6) — “Build the Front Door”

    Based on our February 20, 2026 operational updates, Phase 1 focuses on building accessible daytime infrastructure before adding overnight capacity:

    • Centralized Coordination: Open daytime access with coordinated intake, case management, ID/documentation assistance, benefits enrollment, and workforce programming under one roof. As we covered in Part 11, fragmented services create friction—coordination eliminates it.
    • Strategic Location: We are identifying buildings near essential resources to solve the transportation barrier once and for all. No more five-mile walks to access help you can’t reach.
    • Low-Barrier Access: Open during business hours with no sobriety requirements, no background checks, no mandatory religious services. You can come and go. You can access services without surrendering your autonomy or your possessions.
    • Data-Driven Foundation: Coordinated intake and tracking systems establish baseline data and demonstrate impact to funders and government partners—building the case for Phase 2.

    Phase 2: Transitional Shelter Pilot (3-10 Beds) (Months 7-12) — “Trust the Engine Before Full Throttle”

    A small-scale overnight pilot validates operations and policies before scaling:

    • Proof of Concept: Limited overnight beds (3-10) test shelter operations, staff protocols, and community integration on a manageable scale. This creates a “proof of concept” for the shelter model before full expansion.
    • Structured Participation: Introduction of participation requirements for overnight beds, building trust and accountability systems while maintaining the low-barrier Day Center access.
    • 24-Hour Operations Pilot: Test around-the-clock staffing and security protocols to ensure smooth transition to full shelter operations.

    Phase 3: Full Shelter Operations (15 Beds) (Year 2) — “The House is Fully Furnished”

    Full-scale shelter with comprehensive services:

    • Expanded Capacity: 15 beds with full case management intensity and structured pathways to employment, stable housing, and reintegration into the Putnam County workforce.
    • Professional Staffing: Full-time Executive Director, multiple case managers, overnight attendants, peer specialists—ensuring 24/7 professional support.
    • Community Accountability: By maintaining high standards and addressing neighborhood concerns, we prove that a well-managed facility is a community asset, not a liability.

    Phase 4: Capacity Expansion & System Leadership (20 Beds+) (Year 3+) — “From Program to Platform”

    R.I.S.E. becomes a countywide anchor institution and the county’s primary homelessness response system:

    • Specialized Tracks: Dedicated pathways for veterans, seniors, and people with disabilities—recognizing that different populations need different supports.
    • Employer Partnerships: Employer-sponsored cohorts and employer-in-residence programs that create direct pipelines from homelessness to employment.
    • Regional Leadership: Data-sharing agreements and regional planning coordination, positioning R.I.S.E. as the hub for Putnam County’s entire homelessness response network.

    The Bottom Line

    When the system is professional, accessible, and outcome-oriented, “resistance” fades away. We aren’t building a place for people to stay homeless; we are building the infrastructure for them to stop being homeless.

    The question isn’t “Why won’t they come inside?” The question is “Why haven’t we built something worth coming inside to?”

    Get Involved:

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk?
    Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community.
    Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute.
    Together, we build a fuller picture.

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 11: “The Efficiency Myth”

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and the Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents 

    The Reality: In business, siloed operations create waste, duplication, and missed results. The same holds true in addressing homelessness: Fragmented, uncoordinated charity—however well-intentioned—often leads to inefficiency and gaps. In Putnam County, the belief that “any help is good help” overlooks how scattered efforts create a “Swiss Cheese” safety net full of holes, wasting resources and slowing progress. True efficiency comes from alignment and shared systems. (This builds on Part 8’s resource gaps and Part 9’s diverse needs—coordination ensures tailored, effective support for families, seniors, veterans, and locals.)

    The Myth:

    “We already have plenty of churches and charities helping. Why do we need a Coalition? Won’t that just add another layer of bureaucracy?”

    This misunderstands the problem. The issue isn’t lack of compassion—it’s lack of coordination. And I saw this firsthand.

    When I was homeless in Putnam County, I knew where to get a hot meal on Monday through Friday. But if I needed help filling out housing applications? Or someone to store my documents safely? Or assistance navigating the maze of eligibility requirements for different programs? Those gaps existed not because organizations didn’t care, but because each operated independently without knowing what the others provided or didn’t provide, or extremely slow communication between organizations.

    I’d get referred from one agency to another, only to find out they’d just closed for the day, or they’d run out of funding for the month, or the service I needed wasn’t offered there after all. Every gap cost me time, energy, and hope—and every failed attempt meant burning gas I couldn’t afford to replace. What I needed wasn’t more organizations doing their own thing—I needed those organizations talking to each other.

    As we discussed in Part 5, services work when they reduce friction. But fragmented services create friction—forcing people to navigate a maze of disconnected organizations, each with different eligibility rules, hours, and referral processes. Coordination eliminates that friction.

    The Fragmented Charity Trap

    When multiple groups operate independently without shared strategy:

    • Duplicate Effort: Overlaps (e.g., multiple soup kitchens on the same day) leave gaps in critical services like laundry, case management, job training, or transportation support.

    In Putnam County specifically, our Resource Gap Analysis revealed telling patterns: We have multiple food pantries serving Palatka, but chronic homeless housing? Zero dedicated facilities. Veterans housing? A critical gap that Veteran Building Solutions and Operation Lifeline are now addressing. Transportation for those in rural Florahome or Georgetown to reach services in Palatka? Nearly nonexistent. This isn’t a lack of generosity—it’s a lack of strategic alignment.

    • Resource Leak: Donors and volunteers spread thin across competing causes, diluting impact on shared needs like building space, funding, or skilled staff. When twenty organizations each try to raise funds for their own separate building, none have enough to succeed. When we pool resources toward one shared infrastructure—R.I.S.E.—we actually build something.
    • Data Gap: Without coordination, tracking outcomes is impossible—no visibility into whether someone helped by one group connects to housing via another, leading to repeated crises and higher long-term costs. I could receive a meal from one organization today, get turned away from another tomorrow, and no one would know I’d been circling the system for months without actually getting closer to housing.

    Evidence from communities nationwide shows fragmentation prolongs homelessness and inflates system expenses, while coordinated approaches streamline access and reduce duplication. Unified case management and resource hubs accelerate stability and often yield cost savings through avoided emergency room, hospital, and jail expenses. Coordinated entry and partnerships enable faster rehousing and better outcomes for participants.

    The Coalition Advantage

    The Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition counters this by shifting from random acts to a unified crisis response:

    • Centralized Strategy: Monthly meetings unite partners like Meridian, Heart of Putnam, LSF, Veteran Building Solutions, Operation Lifeline, and others to align goals, share best practices, and avoid silos. When everyone knows what everyone else is doing, we stop duplicating soup kitchens and start filling the actual gaps—like chronic housing, veterans housing, and rural transportation.
    • Shared Resources: Focus on one flagship effort—the R.I.S.E. Initiative—instead of every group pursuing separate buildings or programs. This concentrates donor dollars, volunteer energy, and political capital on infrastructure that will serve everyone.
    • Professionalized Tracking: Our Partner Portal enables coordinated monitoring of milestones, participant progress, and funding opportunities, maximizing every dollar and volunteer hour. Instead of twenty organizations each tracking their own metrics, we share data to see the full picture—who’s being served, who’s falling through cracks, and what’s actually working.

    Florida’s 2025 Council on Homelessness Annual Report highlights coordination’s real-world impact: Statewide efforts reduced overall homelessness by 9.13% and unsheltered cases by 19.1%—driven by targeted partnerships, evidence-based practices, and aligned investments across Continuums of Care. This momentum shows what focused collaboration can achieve statewide—and what we’re working to replicate here in Putnam County.

    Why Efficiency Matters for R.I.S.E.

    R.I.S.E. serves as the Coalition’s infrastructure for high-leverage results:

    • Phase 1: The Day Center — Centrally located near essential resources to eliminate transportation barriers that currently waste participants’ time and scatter efforts. Instead of people driving across the county to access services from five different organizations, they come to one location where case management, skills training, hygiene access, and referrals are coordinated under one roof.
    • Phased Growth — Start with a “soft opening” Day Center to demonstrate success, build a track record, and attract sustained support before scaling to shelter—avoiding overextension. This methodical approach prevents the “build it and hope” model that’s led to failed shelters in other communities.
    • Holistic Delivery — One roof for case management, skills training, mental health support, and more: the essence of operational efficiency, reducing fragmentation and accelerating pathways to stability. When your case manager, your employment counselor, and your housing navigator all work in the same building and share your information (with your consent), you stop falling through cracks.

    The Bottom Line

    Solving homelessness in Putnam County requires more than heart—it demands a better system. Supporting the Coalition and R.I.S.E. puts donations in a coordinated, tracked environment where partners align, outcomes improve, and resources stretch further. We’re not just handing out meals; we’re engineering a sustainable path to end the need for them—turning inefficiency into lasting impact.

    The question isn’t “Why do we need a Coalition?” The question is “How much longer can we afford to keep operating without one?”

    Get Involved:

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk? Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community. Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute. Together, we build a fuller picture.

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 10: “They Aren’t From Here”

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and the Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    The Reality: In the boardroom, when a local market struggles, smart leaders don’t dismiss it by blaming “out-of-towners”—they dig into who’s actually affected and why. In Putnam County, the “Magnet Myth”—the notion that people currently or will flock here from elsewhere to access services or milder conditions—is a persistent distraction. It ignores clear evidence: Our unhoused neighbors are overwhelmingly our own residents, with deep local roots. (This ties into Part 1 on employment myths and Part 9 on diverse local demographics like families and seniors.)

    I lived in Putnam County for 13 years before I became homeless. I built my business here. My wife was cremated here. When I lost everything and ended up living in my van, people asked me, “Why don’t you just move somewhere cheaper?” The answer was simple: This was home. My clients were here. My medical providers who knew my history were here. The geography I knew—where I could park safely, where I could access resources—was here. Starting over in a new county would have meant abandoning the few threads of stability I still had. Most people experiencing homelessness face this same calculation: leaving means losing everything that might help you climb back out.

    The “Magnet” Theory vs. Local Reality

    The belief persists that resources like the R.I.S.E. Initiative will draw unhoused people from surrounding counties or states. Frontline experience and data paint a different picture:

    • Deep Local Roots: The vast majority experiencing homelessness in Putnam County (and similar communities) were already residents here when they lost housing. They have family ties, work histories, and connections in Palatka, Interlachen, and surrounding areas. National studies consistently show 70-90%+ became homeless in the community where they were already living—often after years or decades there—not by migrating for services.
    • Lack of Mobility: Relocation is expensive and logistically impossible in survival mode. Without funds for gas, bus fare, deposits, or moving, people stay where their limited support network exists. Research debunks the “flocking” idea: There’s no strong correlation between generous services and in-migration; barriers like poverty and ties to jobs/family keep most people local.
    • The “Home” Factor: People want to remain where they’re known. Staying in Putnam preserves access to familiar resources, even if strained—echoing why “just move somewhere cheaper” rarely works.

    “Why Don’t They Just Move Somewhere Cheaper?”

    This common critique overlooks poverty’s operational realities:

    • The Cost of Poverty: Moving demands security deposits, first/last month’s rent, and transport—barriers that trap people in place. When you’re living paycheck to paycheck or surviving on gig work, you don’t have $3,000+ for relocation costs.
    • The Employment Anchor: As covered in Part 1, many (~40% nationally) are working. Relocating risks losing jobs, transportation, childcare, or community supports—trading one crisis for another. If you’re working at a local business or have regular gig routes, moving to a new county means starting your income stream from zero.
    • The Support Vacuum: New counties mean isolation, fewer connections, and higher chronic homelessness risk. The church that gives you a hot meal on Monday through Friday, the case manager who knows your situation, the medical clinic where they have your records—all of that disappears when you cross county lines.

    “Won’t Building R.I.S.E. Attract Homeless People from Other Counties?”

    This is one of the most common objections we hear: “If we build it, they will come.” It’s based on fear, not data.

    What the Research Shows:

    • Services Don’t Create Migration: Multiple studies show that homeless service availability does not drive significant in-migration. People don’t research which counties have the best shelters and relocate there—they stay where they already have connections, even if services are limited. A comprehensive review of “magnet effect” claims found no evidence that generous services attract homeless populations from other areas.
    • Weather Myths Are Overblown: Yes, Florida’s climate is milder than northern states, but weather-driven migration is vastly overstated. The majority of people experiencing homelessness in Florida were already Florida residents when they lost housing. Cross-state migration for weather is rare—survival on the streets is brutal regardless of temperature.
    • Visible Homelessness ≠ New Arrivals: When communities open new shelters or services, visible street homelessness often decreases  because people move indoors. What looks like “attracting more homeless people” is actually revealing the existing population that was hidden in cars, woods, and doubled-up situations—as we discussed in Part 7 about the Invisible 90%.

    What Actually Happens:

    Communities that open well-designed facilities see:

    • Decreased visible homelessness (people move from streets/camps into facilities)
    • Reduced emergency costs (fewer ER visits, police calls, jail cycles)
    • Better outcomes (stable addresses enable employment, benefits access, permanent housing placement)

    The fear is that R.I.S.E. will become a “regional magnet.” The reality is that R.I.S.E. will serve the people already here—the 532 homeless students in Putnam County schools, the working families living in vehicles, the seniors on fixed incomes, the veterans who served our country. These aren’t hypothetical future arrivals. They’re our current neighbors.

    The R.I.S.E. Local Focus

    R.I.S.E. is designed explicitly for Putnam’s people—not as a regional magnet.

    • Phase 1 (Day Center): Centralized case management and skills training keep our local workforce stable and connected. It’s a resource for people already living here, with priority given to Putnam County residents.
    • Phase 2 (Shelter): When operational, residency verification and local prioritization will ensure we’re serving our own community first—not becoming a dumping ground for other counties’ failures.
    • Resource Accessibility: Strategic placement near essential services overcomes transportation barriers in our rural county, helping residents rebuild in their home community without needing to relocate.

    The Bottom Line

    Telling our neighbors to “go elsewhere” isn’t a solution—it’s shifting responsibility and ignoring data. Exporting crises to neighboring counties’ ERs or streets costs more long-term. And fearing that we’ll “attract more” by building R.I.S.E. misunderstands both the data and the crisis we already have.

    R.I.S.E. invests in Putnam’s own residents, turning local stability into community strength. Real solutions address root causes here, not myths of migration.

    Get Involved:

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk? Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community. Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute. Together, we build a fuller picture.

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 9: “The Demographic Myth”

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and the Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents

    The Reality: If your mental image of homelessness is a lone adult on a street corner, it’s outdated and incomplete. In operations and community planning, ignoring true demographics leads to mismatched interventions that fail everyone. In Putnam County, homelessness increasingly affects children in our schools, seniors on fixed incomes, and veterans who’ve served our nation—diverse groups requiring tailored support. This builds on Part 1‘s challenge to stereotypes and Part 6‘s look at how systemic gaps perpetuate cycles.

    When I was living in my van, people saw me as a “single homeless man”—the stereotype. They didn’t know I was a widower still processing the loss of my wife to cancer. They didn’t know I was a business owner trying to rebuild. They didn’t know I had a dog who was my only companion and reason to keep going. The demographic labels don’t capture who we are—they capture who the system has failed to see.

    Families and Students: A Hidden Crisis in Classrooms

    Homelessness is often a family issue, not just an individual one.

    • The Schoolhouse Factor: Public schools identified 1,374,537 students experiencing homelessness nationwide in the 2022–23 school year (U.S. Department of Education/National Center for Homeless Education)—a 14% increase from the prior year and part of a longer upward trend (over a 100% rise since 2004–05). Many are doubled-up in overcrowded homes, or living in motels, cars, or shelters while trying to maintain some sense of normalcy. In Putnam County specifically, 532 homeless children were enrolled in school during the most recent documented count (North Central Florida Alliance for the Homeless and Hungry). These aren’t abstract statistics—they’re kids sitting in classrooms at our schools, trying to focus while their families navigate housing crisis.
    • The Barrier to Education: Unstable housing disrupts attendance and performance. Students experiencing homelessness are chronically absent at much higher rates (often 48% or more) and graduate at lower rates (around 68% compared to national averages), meaning we’re not just losing housing stability—we’re risking our future workforce and community potential.

    Working Families: The Invisible Crisis

    As we established in Part 1, 40% of unhoused individuals are employed—and many of those are parents working full-time while living in vehicles or doubled-up situations. These aren’t “lazy people gaming the system”—they’re families where both parents work but rent still exceeds their combined income. In Putnam County, where market-rate rents average $1,500 and minimum wage jobs pay $13-15/hour, even dual-income households can’t afford stability. When the math doesn’t work, hard work alone can’t bridge the gap.

    The “Silver Tsunami”: Seniors on the Edge

    Adults aged 50+ are the fastest-growing segment of the unhoused population, nationally and locally.

    • Fixed Income vs. Rising Costs: Many seniors in Putnam are one medical emergency, rent increase, or unexpected bill away from eviction. HUD data from the 2024 Point-in-Time Count shows people 55+ now make up about one in five of those experiencing homelessness, with nearly half of older adults unhoused in unsheltered situations. Projections indicate this group could triple in size by 2030 without intervention.
    • Safety Net Gaps: These are lifelong workers and caregivers being priced out of the communities they helped build, reflecting broader failures in affordable housing, benefits access, and long-term care planning.

    A Debt Owed: Our Veterans

    Veterans remain disproportionately affected, even as targeted efforts show that focused strategies work.

    • The Transition Gap: Service-related trauma, employment barriers, and delays in accessing benefits all contribute to vulnerability. Nationally, 32,882 veterans experienced homelessness on a single night in January 2024 (HUD PIT Count)—a roughly 7.5–8% decrease from 2023 and the lowest level since tracking began in 2009, with an overall drop of about 55% thanks to programs like HUD–VASH.
    • Local Focus: Our Coalition partners Veteran Building Solutions and Operation Lifeline are actively securing homeless veteran housing in Putnam County—directly addressing a critical gap. “Thank you for your service” is being translated into concrete housing, wraparound support, and the specialized services veterans have earned through their sacrifice.

    Why Demographics Matter for R.I.S.E.

    One-size-fits-all approaches fail when needs are this diverse. The R.I.S.E. Initiative is built with that reality in mind.

    • Tailored Case Management: Specialized navigation for seniors and veterans to access VA benefits, Social Security, medical supports, and long-term housing; family-focused support for parents rebuilding stability for their children.
    • Skills Training & Pathways: Workforce re-entry programs for parents and younger adults, designed to sustain families; age-appropriate resources and gentle on-ramps for seniors.
    • Phase 1 Day Center: A centralized hub that reduces street presence while offering demographic-specific entry points—creating order, safety, and opportunity in one connected system.

    The Bottom Line

    Homelessness in Putnam County is diverse, touching families, children, seniors, and veterans—not just the stereotypes. Ignoring these realities ignores our neighbors and wastes resources. R.I.S.E. sees the whole person and the whole picture, delivering targeted stability that strengthens the entire community. Real progress comes from data-driven, inclusive solutions—not outdated assumptions.

    Get Involved:

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk? Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community. Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute. Together, we build a fuller picture.

  • Myths of Homelessness Part 4: “It’s Just a Drug or Mental Health Problem”

    Lived Experience Perspective

    This series is written from lived experience. Posts are authored by Red Conrad, a Co-Founder and Strategic Alliance Lead of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition, and other coalition members who have experienced homelessness firsthand. We’re giving you an inside look at the reality behind the myths.

    This post includes testimony from Beth (@voiceofbeth on Instagram/Threads). Her complete testimony is the ‘Voices from the Street // Beth: Sober, Employable, and Breaking Every Stereotype’, used with permission.

    Myths of Homelessness Table of Contents 

    The Diagnosis That Followed Me

    I was diagnosed with depression at 16, then again at 25. For years, I managed it. I had stability, routines, medication, a life that worked. I wasn’t “cured,” but I was functional.

    Then I lost my wife to cancer. Then I lost my home. Then I was living in my van.*¹

    My depression didn’t cause my homelessness—but homelessness nearly destroyed me with it.

    In Part 2, I shared how my depression—which I’d managed for years—became overwhelming once I lost my wife and my home. That’s the pattern: homelessness doesn’t cause mental health issues, but it makes existing conditions exponentially worse.

    The Myth vs. The Reality

    One of the most persistent myths about homelessness is that it’s fundamentally a “drug or mental health problem”—that if we just “fix” people’s addiction or mental illness, homelessness will solve itself.

    This gets the causation backwards.

    While substance use and mental health challenges are present in the homeless population, they are frequently the result of the trauma of displacement, not the initial cause. In Putnam County, the primary drivers of homelessness are economic: a lack of affordable housing and wages that don’t cover rent. The mental health crisis and substance use often come after someone loses their housing, not before.

    When Survival Makes You Sick

    I had my depression under control—until I didn’t have a place to live. Then everything that kept me stable disappeared.

    The constant hypervigilance. Wondering where I could park each night without getting “the knock” from police. Where I could park during the day between gigs without being told to move. The mental energy spent trying to look “normal” so potential employers wouldn’t realize I was living in my van. The days I didn’t know if I could keep going.

    Living on the street in Florida means extreme sleep deprivation, physical danger, and constant “fight or flight” stress. Your nervous system never gets to rest. You can’t sleep deeply because you need to stay alert. You can’t plan for tomorrow because you’re barely surviving today.

    This is when people turn to substances—not because they’re “addicts” who caused their own homelessness, but because they’re trying to survive it. Some use stimulants to stay awake at night for safety. Others use alcohol or other substances to numb the physical pain of sleeping on concrete, or to quiet the anxiety long enough to get a few hours of rest.

    I watched it happen. People who weren’t using before they became homeless, self-medicating just to endure another day.

    Beth, who shares her experience on Instagram as @voiceofbeth, puts it bluntly: “Not everybody’s an addict. I, for one, am stone cold sober. I’m quite employable. I was leaving a bad situation and I thought that homelessness would be better for my mental health, and it is.” But she also describes how easy it is to fall into substance use when you’re stuck without resources or transportation: “Eventually, after a while of being homeless, you can veer off into that real easy because there’s not a lot you can do…You might as well smoke a bowl. You might as well, you know, whatever, smoke meth or whatever you’re doing, drink a beer.” It’s not that homeless people are addicts—it’s that homelessness creates the conditions where substance use becomes a survival mechanism.

    The Impossible Catch-22

    Here’s what people don’t understand about the “just get treatment” argument: You cannot effectively treat a clinical diagnosis while someone is living in a tent or a vehicle.

    I had depression before I was homeless. I knew what treatment looked like. But try accessing mental health care when:

    • You don’t have a stable address for appointment reminders
    • You don’t have a shower to show up clean and “presentable”
    • You don’t have a guarantee your car won’t be towed while you’re in the waiting room
    • You’re spending 100% of your mental energy on immediate survival

    The system says “get stable, then we’ll help you with housing.” But you can’t get stable without housing. That’s not a pathway—that’s a trap.

    Stability is the prerequisite for recovery, not the reward for it.

    The Economic Reality

    The majority of people experiencing homelessness in Putnam County are “economically homeless”—families and individuals who are one car breakdown or medical bill away from the street, regardless of their mental health status.

    I had a business. I had skills. I had work ethic. What I didn’t have was affordable housing in a county where market-rate rents average $1,500 and wages haven’t kept pace. When crisis hit, there was no safety net.

    Using addiction or mental illness as an excuse to withhold housing is backwards. If we want people to be healthy and sober, we have to provide the foundation—stable housing—that makes health possible.

    The Operational Logic

    In business, if a piece of equipment consistently fails, a poor manager blames the “quality” of the machine. A strategic leader looks at the operating environment. If you run a machine at 110% capacity in a room with no ventilation, it will break.

    Our unhoused neighbors aren’t “broken people.” They’re human beings trying to function in an environment designed to break them. Sleep deprivation, constant stress, no medical care, no stability—this environment would damage anyone’s mental health.

    The Coalition’s Approach

    The Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition advocates for Housing First models.

    Get people housed first. Then provide support services. Then watch recovery become possible.

    This isn’t enabling—it’s strategic. You can’t address mental health or addiction while someone is fighting for survival on the street. You provide the stable foundation, then you build the supports.

    This isn’t just compassionate. It’s effective. And it costs taxpayers less than our current crisis-management approach of cycling people through emergency rooms, jails, and police calls.*²

    Get Involved:

    The answer to Putnam County’s homelessness crisis isn’t more judgment about addiction or mental health. It’s more housing.

    Join the Coalition or Volunteer for the Rapid Response Team

    Support our mission 

    Join our Facebook Group and Like/Follow our Facebook Page

    Share this post to your Nextdoor or Facebook groups to challenge the narrative.

    References:

     

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk?
    Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story for the ‘Voices From The Street’ series.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community.
    Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute.
    Together, we build a fuller picture.

     

    Guest Voice: Beth shares her experience of homelessness across multiple states on Threads and Instagram as @voiceofbeth. Her full testimony is ‘Voices from the Street // Beth: Sober, Employable, and Breaking Every Stereotype‘

  • Voices From The Street // Beth: Sober, Employable, and Breaking Every Stereotype

    Welcome to Voices From The Street, a new sub-series under Myths of Homelessness. Here, we amplify real stories from people with lived experience—raw, unfiltered insights that challenge stereotypes and humanize the crisis. We start with Beth (@voiceofbeth on Instagram/Threads), who shared this powerful audio message. Her experiences across multiple cities show homelessness isn’t defined by addiction, low intelligence, or pests—it’s about survival, resilience, and systemic gaps.

    Follow Beth on Instagram and Threads

    If you found this post from links in the Myths of Homelessness series Parts 2, 4, 7, 8, 12 (as they publish), be sure to give her a follow. If you have a story to share for the ‘Voices From The Street’ sub series of the ‘Myths of Homelessness’ series, you can opt to remain anonymous, send your submission to PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com

    Key Insights from Beth

    Not Everyone Is an Addict

    Beth is clear: “I, for one, am stone cold sober. I’m quite employable… I was leaving a bad situation and I thought that homelessness would be better for my mental health, and it is. So not everybody’s an addict.”

    She explains how addiction can emerge later as a response to isolation and lack of options: “Eventually… you can veer off into that real easy because there’s not a lot you can do… you’re stuck… you might as well smoke a bowl… drink a beer.”

    This aligns with research showing substance use is frequently a consequence of homelessness rather than the sole cause—many people begin or increase use as a way to cope with trauma, boredom, and limited access to support.

    Intelligence, Creativity, and Resourcefulness

    “A lot of people who have never been homeless equate homelessness with a lack of intelligence… the people that I have found to be homeless, they are some of the most amazing people… some of the most creative, some of the most brilliant…”

    She shares the story of Shawn and Becky in the Biloxi/Gulfport area:

    “It was a trash pile when they started… By the time this dude was done… it had like a little pathway… tiny sticks lining the pathway… old basin as handwashing station… these guys went above and beyond.”

    Beth observes that many unhoused people demonstrate exceptional problem-solving and adaptability, often struggling to fit rigid social or work structures rather than lacking ability.

    The Bed Bugs Myth and Shelter Realities

    “Not all homeless people have bed bugs… Campers never have bed bugs because… bed bugs cannot survive… sunlight.”

    In contrast, she describes severe infestations in shelters and low-budget hotels: “this place [in Miami]… was overrun with bed bugs… even in their… clothes closet… supposed to have been heat treated… thousands of dead bed bugs.”

    This highlights a key reason many avoid shelters: fear of pests, strict rules (tiny lockers, item limits), and loss of possessions—especially for newly unhoused people who haven’t yet “gone through that purge… death of materialism.”

    Dehumanization and Basic Dignity

    “If you’ve never been homeless… you don’t know what it’s like when you can’t even use a restroom… people are mocking you… shitting behind a bush. Well, if you treated me like a human, I would have just used the toilet.”

    Beth emphasizes that small acts of dignity (access to bathrooms, respect, resources) make an enormous difference.

    Connecting to R.I.S.E. in Putnam County

    Beth’s story underscores why structured, dignified solutions matter: safe bathrooms, case management to prevent isolation spirals, skills training to support employable people, and a welcoming hub that honors creativity and resilience. Florida’s 2025 Council on Homelessness Report shows real progress—9.13% statewide drop in homelessness and 19.1% decline in unsheltered cases through targeted partnerships and coordination. Our Program is built on the same principle: local, accessible resources that help neighbors rebuild stability in their own community.

    Transcription (Edited Lightly for Clarity/Flow)

    [0:00] Hey, Red Conrad. This is for your myths of homelessness uh for the Putnam homeless solutions blog, vlog, whatever you’re doing over there. First of all, I want to say hi. I’m Beth from @voiceofbeth on Instagram. There are a lot of myths about the homeless. The one that really comes to mind for me personally is that everybody who’s homeless is an addict or like a prostitute or something like that. I, for one, am stone cold sober. I’m quite employable. You know, I’m just—I was leaving a bad situation and I thought that homelessness would be better for my mental health, and it is. So, not everybody’s an addict. Eventually, after a while of being homeless, you can veer off into that real easy because there’s not a lot you can do. Especially like if you don’t have access to public transportation, if you don’t have access to resources, if you’re just stuck homeless up in a mountain town, you’re screwed. You might as well smoke a bowl. You might as well, you know, whatever, smoke meth or whatever you’re doing, drink a beer. So not every homeless person is an addict.

    [1:39] Also, a lot of people who have never been homeless equate homelessness with a lack of intelligence. In my experience—and I’ve been homeless in Dallas, I’ve been homeless in Miami, I’ve been homeless in Biloxi, I’ve been homeless in Gulfport. I’m now homeless in Oregon—the people that I have found to be homeless, they are some of the most amazing people that you will meet. Now, are there some jerks and stuff in there? Some real scary, creepy people? Yes. Is it the majority? Not necessarily. It depends on your area. It depends on who your little crowd is. I’ve met some of the most creative, some of the most brilliant homeless people that you wouldn’t even believe it.

    [2:58] Specifically, there was this one couple, Shawn and Becky, that I met in the Biloxi Gulfport area. They—just like every other homeless person—they didn’t have anything to do all day. And, you know, you don’t just stay up on your phone. You’re on your phone a little bit, but you don’t stay up on your phone because you don’t know when you’re going to charge next, you know, unless you have a system down. So, they spent their time—Shawn specifically—built… It was a trash pile when they started, right? By the time this dude was done with it, this thing was amazing. Okay, it had like a little pathway. Little tiny sticks were lining the pathway. Like he used this old basin and like that was the handwashing station. Like these guys went above and beyond and they are only one example of so many that I have found across the nation that were just brilliant. Some of them painted shells to earn money. Some of them played music and busked. You know, they’re… Homeless people—when you see a homeless person, I can almost guarantee you they have a higher than average IQ. And that’s why they’re homeless, too, is because they can’t exist within a lot of the social structures we have today within working and stuff like that. Maybe they have a slight mental illness, but it’s manageable. You know what I mean? Like there—people just… on the homeless. I’m never going to understand it.

    [4:21] Another myth is that homeless people have bed bugs. They do not. If you’re looking for bed bugs, they can have them, but they don’t come from campers. Like there’s different tiers of homelessness. And one tier is like where you have a tent set up in some wilderness part of an urban area or even a country area, a rural area. And those are like campers, right? The campers never have bed bugs because the bed bugs cannot survive in any type of sunlight. Now, if you live in a shelter—if you… there was a shelter I stayed at in Miami, I think called Chapman, I believe it’s 1550 North Miami Avenue or something like that. Anyway, this place was overrun with bed bugs, okay? Overrun. It was even in their stores of like they had like a clothes closet and this was supposed to have been heat treated, right? And it was supposed to have been sanitized or whatever they do with their processes there. It was not. Like I—my ex, I was with a dude at that time and my ex pulled out one of those braided belts from like the early 90s late 80s and it was just thousands of dead bed bugs in there. It was so gross. There was just bed bugs everywhere. So like shelters might have bed bugs. Campers don’t have them. Low budget hotels that you can stay pay by the week—they were in a Dallas hotel that I stayed at. It was so horrible. The bed bugs are just horrendous. So that’s another myth. Not all homeless people have bed bugs.

    [5:45] Okay, they’re not addicts. They’re not stupid. They don’t have bed bugs. Not all of them anyway. And I’m trying to think what else do they have? What other myths are there? There’s so friggin many. You can’t just go to a shelter. And it’s not just about the lack of beds and funding. There’s a lot of things like you’re only allowed so many items. In some shelters you only have a teeny tiny locker. And if you just are newly homeless, you have a ton of stuff still. You haven’t gone through that purge of items since you haven’t gone through that death of materialism yet. So there’s a lot, there’s a lot of myths. If I think of more, Red Conrad, I will definitely send you some. I wish you well on your mission. I know you deserve it. I like to see these homeless organizations being run by somebody who actually was homeless. You know, I mean, even if you haven’t been, it’s good to have a heart for the homeless, but at the same time, like, if you’ve never been homeless, you don’t know what it’s like. You don’t know what it’s like when you can’t even use a restroom, you know? And like, people are mocking you for seeing you drive down the side of the road and you’re shitting behind a bush. Well, if you treated me like a human, I would have just used the toilet. You know what I mean? So, anyway, bye, Red Conrad. Edit this video how you need to. I hope you have a great rest of your day.

    Share Your Story

    Have lived experience, frontline insight, or a Putnam-specific myth to debunk? Coalition partners, advocates, and neighbors are invited to contribute a guest post or share your story to the Voices From The Street series; you can opt to remain anonymous.

    Your insights help us drive the reality of homelessness in our community. Email PutnamHomelessSolutions@gmail.com to contribute. Together, we build a fuller picture.

  • The Hidden Price Tag: Why Solving Homelessness is a Fiscal Win

    We often hear the objection that building housing capacity is “too expensive.” But this assumes the status quo is free. It’s not. In fact, the status quo has a hidden price tag that far exceeds the cost of solutions—we just pay it in the most inefficient ways possible.

    In the boardroom, we talk about ROI (Return on Investment). In community leadership, we talk about the Social Safety Net. Usually, these two worlds are treated as opposites. But when it comes to homelessness in Putnam County, the fiscal reality is simple: Doing nothing is the most expensive option we have.

    In our upcoming post “‘Myths of Homelessness’ Part 6: “It’s Too Expensive to Fix””, we’ll break down these costs with specific Putnam County data and show exactly where your tax dollars are going right now. But first, let’s look at the national and state picture.

    As we outlined in our recent post on the gap between compassion and capacity, current efforts provide a vital safety net—yet systemic gaps (like dedicated chronic and veterans housing) keep people cycling through crises.

    The “Emergency Only” Expense Loop

    When a neighbor has no path to stability, they don’t stop costing the county money; they just cost it in the most inefficient ways possible. Without a “Welcome Home” or chronic housing options, the system defaults to:  

    • Emergency Services: A single ER visit for a preventable condition costs thousands—often absorbed by the taxpayer or the hospital. Nationally and in Florida communities, chronic homelessness drives frequent crisis use, with unhoused individuals costing taxpayers $30,000–$50,000+ per person per year in emergency healthcare, law enforcement, and related services.
    • Law Enforcement: Officers trained for public safety find themselves navigating housing crises—work they’re neither equipped nor budgeted for. 
    • The Judicial Cycle: Jailing someone for “crimes of survival” (like sleeping in public) costs a daily rate that far exceeds the cost of supportive housing.

    From “System Consumer” to “Community Contributor”

    The goal of the Putnam County Homelessness Solutions Coalition isn’t just to provide charity; it’s to move people out of the “Emergency Loop.”  

    When we provide a path to Stability, we change the economic math:  

    • Reduced Burden: Frequent users of emergency services see a massive drop in crisis incidents once they are housed—proven supportive housing models consistently show 40–60% reductions in emergency service use, hospitalizations, and jail time, with net taxpayer savings of $900–$29,400 per person annually with North Central Florida examples estimating ~$29,000 in annual taxpayer savings per person housed.
    • Resource Reallocation: Police and EMS can focus on public safety and life-saving emergencies rather than navigating the gaps in our housing system. 
    • The Local Economy: Stability allows for employment. Employment leads to local spending. More importantly, stability allows people to rebuild their lives—to work, to contribute, to become neighbors rather than statistics. This is how we begin to restore the tax base.

    Investing in Solutions, Not Symptoms

    If you ran a business where a specific machine kept breaking down, you wouldn’t just keep paying for expensive, daily emergency repairs forever. You’d invest in fixing the machine so it could get back to work. And if your competitors were getting better performance with 30-68% lower costs? You’d be studying their model immediately.

    Our current system is paying for “emergency repairs” every single day. The Coalition is here to fix the machine.  

    By filling the gaps we identified in our Resource Gap Analysis, we aren’t just being “nice.” We are being smart. Recent analyses of proven Housing First models show supportive housing often costs 30–68% less overall than the status quo—yielding returns like $1.44 in savings for every $1 invested. We are choosing to invest in a permanent foundation that yields a better return for every resident of Putnam County.

    Want to see what this looks like specifically in Putnam County? In our upcoming ‘Myths of Homelessness’ series Part 6: “It’s Too Expensive to Fix” breaks down the local costs with researched and compiled data. Subscribe to the Insights or Like/Follow our Facebook Page so you don’t miss a post. 

    The Coalition is building that permanent foundation. The fiscal case is clear. The moral case is clear. What remains is the choice: continue paying the hidden price tag, or invest in solutions that work. If you’re ready to be part of the solution, join us.